Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011)

Published: 2011-03-02

The Adjudicated Case Study Method: Editor's Introduction

A Promising Strategy for Critically Evaluating Case Studies: Introduction to an Issue on the Adjudicated Case Study Method

Daniel B. Fishman

1-5
- PDF

Ronald Miller's "Panels of Psychological Inquiry"

Real Clinical Trials (RCT') -- Panels of Psychological Inquiry for Transforming Anecdotal Data into Clinical Facts and Validated Judgments: Introduction to a Pilot Test with the Case of "Anna"

Ronald B. Miller

6-36
- PDF
Seeing Beyond the Scars: A Testament to "Anna"

Stacy M. Podetz

37-63
- PDF
Subjected to Proof: The Advocate's Perspective

Alexandra Jessup Altman

64-73
- PDF
"Anna" and the Panel of Psychological Inquiry: The Critic's Perspective

Jess DiGiorgianni

74-87
- PDF
Panel of Psychological Inquiry: The Therapist’s Perspective

Stacy M. Podetz

88-94
- PDF
Findings of the Panel of Psychological Inquiry Convened at Saint Michael’s College, May 13, 2008: The Case of "Anna"

Ronald B. Miller, Marc Kessler, Marion Bauer, Sandra Howell, Kenneth Kreiling, Melvin Miller

95-100
- PDF

Arthur Bohart's "Research Jury Method"

The "Research Jury Method": The Application of the Jury Trial Model to Evaluating the Validity of Descriptive and Causal Statements about Psychotherapy Process and Outcome

Arthur C. Bohart, Karen L. Tallman, Gayle C. Byock, Thomas Mackrill

101-144
- PDF
Developing a Systematic Framework for Utilizing Discrete Types of Qualitative Data as Therapy Research Evidence

Arthur C. Bohart, Makenna C. Berry, Carrie L. Wicks

145-155
- PDF
A Diary-Based, Cross-Contextual Case Study Methodology: Background for the Case of "Jane and Joe"

Thomas Mackrill

156-186
- PDF
The Case of "Jane and Joe": A Diary-Based, Cross-Contextual Case Study

Thomas Mackrill

187-229
- PDF

Robert Elliott's "Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design," and Susan Stephen and Robert Elliott's Commentary

Developing the Adjudicated Case Study Method

Susan Stephen, Robert Elliott

230-241
- PDF